Archive for the ‘Historical Application and Problems’ Category

February 3rd, 2010

Hollywood and the Middle Ages. Yes, again

The Disneyfication of the Middle Ages

The Disneyfication of the Middle Ages

Idling around on the Internet, I came across this academic article from 1998 discussing ‘The Ahistoricism of Medieval Film’. It’s more than a decade old and it’s rather long, but quite a good read if you’re interested in the relationship between the history of the Middle Ages and the way the period is depicted in the recent cinema.

There’s a good deal of harrumphing in it about what the author, Arthur Lindley, calls the ‘Disneyfication of the Middle Ages’. But there is also a thoughtful discussion of the ways in which filmmakers map the cultural and political concerns and debates of the present onto the malleable material of the past. The Middle Ages are particularly ripe for this, suggests Lindley, since they are essentially divorced from the present in terms of our contextual awareness of events and environment, but are also familiar in a variety of important imaginative modes, many of which are specifically attractive to filmmakers.

Worth reading. Especially so in anticipation of Ridley Scott’s forthcoming Robin Hood film. Russell Crowe is touted to be a dark Robin: the greenwood freedom fighter now painted as amoral and violent, rather than the heroic socialist of the late twentieth century. There are few other legends which work quite so effectively as historical palimpsests.

January 27th, 2010

Is Quentin Tarantino finally going to get medieval on our asses?

I admit, I’m late on this.

But.

Last week The Sun reported that Dame Helen Mirren has been tapped up by Quentin Tarantino to play - in showbiz reporter Gordon Smart’s words - “a foul-mouthed medieval monarch”. According to a ’source’ (hmm), “Helen has never worked with Tarantino and is interested.”

So many ifs, buts and probably nots here, but as a rumour it is rather pleasing. And there’s a nice parlour game, too. Which medieval queen?

Given that Hollywood would probably relax the boundaries of the term ‘medieval’ to include anything between the conquest of Britain in 43AD and the seventeenth century, my top three predictions are:

1. Boudicca
2. Eleanor of Aquitaine
3. Mary I
4. Catherine Parr
5. Hang on, that’s more than three
6.= Empress Matilda
6.= Matilda of Boulogne
8. The Lady in the Lake

I’ve discounted Joan of Arc on grounds of age. This is Helen Mirren.

Update: According to my ’source’ (actually a real sentient existing human person who knows about this sort of thing, so possibly a step up from your usual tabloid ’source’), “My gut instinct is that this is bollocks. But you never know.” Bah!

January 13th, 2010

The Staffordshire Hoard

Never was an historical cause so worthy of support. Please visit the campaign page here.

The Staffordshire hoard is the most important and the largest find of Anglo-Saxon gold and silver in existence, and the campaign to raise £3.3m to keep it together and in what was once Mercia is a noble one.

As my old tutor Dr David Starkey was quoted saying today, this hoard epitomises what good history is all about:

“History is not just about reason and logic, which is what you get with the school curriculum, it is about story and myth and emotion. This hoard has got all of those things.”

January 12th, 2010

Assassin’s Creed II: a video game for grown-ups?

My PlayStation 3 is currently seeing active service playing Tweenies DVDs in my daughter’s bedroom. But as soon as I can ween her off them, it’ll be recommissioned to run Assassin’s Creed II.

This article, from the Wall Street Journal, reads the game rather seriously, as the closest thing to time-travel into fifteenth-century Italy. The official trailer looks stunning, albeit pretty hammy in terms of storyline and dialogue. One hopes that the gameplay has improved from the gorgeous but repetitive Assassin’s Creed I, which was set during the crusades.

I don’t know many historians who take video games seriously - with the exception of Second World War nuts who tend to go beserk for games like ‘Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2′. But they attract huge audiences to worlds that are rendered increasingly faithfully to their supposed models. Maybe it’s time we paid them the attention they deserve?

Assassin’s Creed II gameplay trailer is here:

January 8th, 2010

Another movie: ‘Black Death’

The year is barely upon us, and there’s another medieval movie thundering over the horizon. It’s called ‘Black Death’. No prizes for guessing which fourteenth-century plague it concerns. Christopher Smith directs. Sean Bean stars as Ulric, a hardbitten knight who encounters a necromancer in a swamp. Tim McInnerny gets a credit as a character called ‘Hob’. For some reason everyone else has Anglo-Saxon names. I can’t find a trailer at present, but you can check out an image gallery here.

My suspicion, alas, is that it will be pestilential cack. But hope springs eternal. The press screening is coming up in about 10 days, so I will be able to post a full review in due course.

Update: It’s released on 26 February. Sorry, should have mentioned that

December 21st, 2009

Canterbury, NY

I have subscribed to the New Yorker for a few years now. (Friday afternoons, I usually take that and the Speccie to the pub. They’re good reading partners, despite the difference in political outlook and tone.)

There’s not a whole lot of good stuff on medieval history covered in the New Yorker, so this week it was with some delight I read this piece by Joan Acocella about Geoffrey Chaucer and the Canterbury Tales. Well worth a look, although I’m afraid the link I’ve provided only directs to an abstract of the much-longer article. You’ll have to subscribe to get the full thing. (Or maybe wait awhile? Sometimes they put stuff up after a delay of a few weeks.)

Poor old Peter Ackroyd, a writer I very much admire, takes a bit of a kicking from Acocella for his free-handed retelling of the Tales. I doubt he minds very much. If he does, he shouldn’t. Granted, the combination of a prose rendition and Ackroyd’s pottymouthed generosity with modern profanity gives his version of the tales a very different feel to the original. The poetry is literally lost in translation. But then, isn’t all poetry? If you want to inhale the spirit of Chaucer, just read the original. Middle English ain’t that hard, and every decent verse edition out there has extensive footnotes to help you along the way.

Ackroyd’s book, as it says quite pointedly in the title, is a retelling. It’s a spirited modern take, and a good introduction both to Ackroyd and to Chaucer.

Anyway, subscribe to the New Yorker, read the piece and have a very Merry Christmas.

December 2nd, 2009

Books of the Year 2009

There have been plenty of brilliant history books this year, despite the general gloom. Do click through here to read my round-up of the best of them, from The Times.

November 23rd, 2009

Popular vs Academic

Hat-tip to my friend Paul Wilson for sending this link to a marvellous piece by Simon Heffer at the Telegraph. Heffer has leapt to defend his friend Andrew Roberts against a withering review in the TLS of his latest book, ‘The Storm of War: A New History of the Second World War’. The review was written by Richard Evans, Regius Professor of History at Cambridge.

Heffer’s review of the review is worth noting here because it raises some interesting points about the relationship between some ‘academic’ historians and some ‘popular’ historians. I use the qualifying quotation marks here because - of course - there are many historians working in universities who have wide popular readerships, just as there are many historians on the outside who write specialist, difficult works which are not, in the literal sense of the word, popular.

I don’t intend to make any remarks about either Professor Evans or Andrew Roberts, other than to say that I enjoyed Roberts’ book immensely. I am not an expert on the history of the Second World War, whereas Evans has written exhaustively about it. Indeed, a decade or so ago he was called as an expert witness at a libel trial which hinged on his expertise in that field. But as an intelligent non-specialist reader, I found ‘The Storm of War’ to be an absorbing, lucid and gripping account of an immense subject.

What Heffer is suggesting is that Evans’ review captures the bitterness felt in a few pockets of the academic community towards historians who a) sell lots of books, b) get invited to exciting dinner parties and c) don’t have to sit through dull faculty meetings. There’s something in that, I think.

November 17th, 2009

Marginalia, CA

Having thought I had no excuse to visit Los Angeles since January this year, I am ticked off to have overlooked a golden opportunity. The Getty Center has just finished showing an exhibition called ‘Out of Bounds: Images in the Margins of Medieval Manuscripts’. How infuriating to have missed it. Still, the interactive guide (click the link) is a neat little taster. (Although it only shows the work of a couple of the artists on display.) Thankfully, a book is available. Maybe a quick hop over to LAX to pick up a copy is in order after all.

Update: I am researching designs for a medieval tattoo, drawing on the spirit and style of fourteenth-century marginalia at the moment. Having trouble finding an artist. If anyone knows of one (UK or US based), please get in touch via the contact page.

Update 2: Apparently the book is not for sale outside the US and Canada. American site visitors: please get in touch if you are able to get a copy on my behalf!

The Author

Dan Jones

Dan Jones was born in 1981 and graduated from Cambridge with a First in History in 2002.

~ Read more

The Book

Summer of Blood

Summer of Blood:
The Peasants’ Revolt of 1381 Available to buy now from Amazon.co uk