Archive for the ‘The current cinema’ Category

May 14th, 2010

What happens when you interview Robin Hood

There’s an extraordinary story doing the rounds in London medialand at the moment about what happened when a men’s magazine went to Australia to photograph Russell Crowe for a story that accompanies the ‘Robin Hood’ release this month.*

At home with Russell sounds like a truly terrifying place to be. As does in interview with Russell, judging by this, broadcast on Front Row recently.

* Does that sound unfairly teasing? Sorry, but if I record the version I heard here I a) won’t do it justice and b) will probably end up with a writ…. Let’s just say that it’s a cross between early Hunter S Thompson and this

May 12th, 2010

Ridley Scott's 'Robin Hood': reviews

Not my review (I have been too busy to seek out a press screening). But here are some of the latest professional judgements. The general consensus seems to be that this is an borderline excellent, four-star movie, closer in style to Chris Nolan’s ‘Batman Begins’/'Dark Knight’ joints than the hokey camp of Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves.

The Guardian: “This is strong stuff.” ****
Empire: “The mullet-free Robin Hood movie we’ve been waiting decades for.” ****
The Daily Telegraph: “What saves the movie, which is quite flawed but still Scott’s best in nearly a decade, is its majestic feel for the English landscape.” ***
Variety: “”Robin Hood” comes to resemble a medieval “Bourne” movie as it darts hither and yon from Nottingham to the northern coast of France”
The News of the World: “If 12th-century warfare didn’t look like this, it flamin’ well should have done.” ****
The Daily Mail: “Sir Ridley Scott makes a triumphant return to form with this magnificent epic.” ****

April 4th, 2010

Rid/Russ Robin Hood: Lots of juicy details

Check out this piece…

Source: The Times

March 17th, 2010

Robin Hood trailer 2

Looks very much like the Ridley-Russell Robin has reverted to Hollywood form…. Still, roll on May 14.

February 6th, 2010

The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo

When you read the Millennium books it’s both easy and difficult to see why they have been so successful. Difficult, because Larsson is not a good writer. His plots are long, flabby and tenuous. Some of his action scenes are risible. Larsson’s descriptions of violence against women - his favourite hobby horse - are mawkish and distastefully graphic. Easy because Larsson invented a truly original character…

Do wander over to GQ.com to read my latest books piece. This week I reconsidered Stieg Larsson and his ‘Millennium’ trilogy, in advance of the UK release of ‘The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo’ in UK cinemas on March 10th.

The piece is here.

And this is the Swedish film trailer:

February 3rd, 2010

The Middle Ages at the Oscars

The Secret of Kells

The Secret of Kells

Can’t really get too excited about the Oscars this year. Usually I’ve read the Hollywood issue of Vanity Fair cover to cover by now. But this year… not so much.

Until now.

I’ve just read that The Secret of Kells - an animated film riffing on the story of the making of the great Irish illuminated manuscript known as The Book of Kells, and the Viking raids on Ireland during the ninth century - is included in the nominations for the Animated Feature Film category. Competition is ridiculous, but it sounds like nomination is reward enough.

According to IMDB, the film has had its festival premieres in the UK and USA (and elsewhere) already. But I don’t know that it’s been on general release.

Gonna track down a DVD asap…

Links: The Blog of Kells

Cartoon Salon site.

Hat-tip: Melissa’s Medieval History Blog.

February 3rd, 2010

Hollywood and the Middle Ages. Yes, again

The Disneyfication of the Middle Ages

The Disneyfication of the Middle Ages

Idling around on the Internet, I came across this academic article from 1998 discussing ‘The Ahistoricism of Medieval Film’. It’s more than a decade old and it’s rather long, but quite a good read if you’re interested in the relationship between the history of the Middle Ages and the way the period is depicted in the recent cinema.

There’s a good deal of harrumphing in it about what the author, Arthur Lindley, calls the ‘Disneyfication of the Middle Ages’. But there is also a thoughtful discussion of the ways in which filmmakers map the cultural and political concerns and debates of the present onto the malleable material of the past. The Middle Ages are particularly ripe for this, suggests Lindley, since they are essentially divorced from the present in terms of our contextual awareness of events and environment, but are also familiar in a variety of important imaginative modes, many of which are specifically attractive to filmmakers.

Worth reading. Especially so in anticipation of Ridley Scott’s forthcoming Robin Hood film. Russell Crowe is touted to be a dark Robin: the greenwood freedom fighter now painted as amoral and violent, rather than the heroic socialist of the late twentieth century. There are few other legends which work quite so effectively as historical palimpsests.

January 29th, 2010

Black Death review

Black Death movie stillI saw Sean Bean strutting his bubonic stuff in ‘Black Death’ last night. Not bad. Certainly not as bad as it could have been.

Plot recap: It’s 1349. England’s population has been scythed down by the bubonic plague. Word gets around that there’s one village untouched by the pestilence. A knight by the name of Ulric (Sean Bean) and his band of followers want to check it out. They grab a young monk, Osmund (Eddie Redmayne) as their guide. Osmund has an ulterior motive in joining them. This involves, predictably if not especially appropriately for a wannabe monk, a hot medieval wench.

Anyway, off they pop to find the village. When they get there, they find a balding bloke called Hob (Tim McInnerny) presiding over a hotbed of necromancy. Since this is a horror film, set in a violent age, bad things soon happen, many of which involve bubonic pustules; some of which involve divorcing innocent people from their limbs.

Good points: for a relatively low-budget film about a medieval disease, Black Death is surprisingly beautiful. The sets and costumes are convincing, and the landscape, shot in a chilly palate of grey-greens and slate, feels just right. The freckled Redmayne is cast very well. He has a startled, supernatural look about him, which works very well here. Sean Bean is all gruff voice and prickly beard: you know what to expect from the Bean, and you get it in spades.

Bad points: this is basically The Wicker Man in tights. But with less Britt Ekland. The horror isn’t particularly weird or scary, just a bit gross. The necromancer (Carice van Houten) is pretty but not very sexy – which is a crime against the trade of necromancy IMHO. The narrative arc is a bit flat: Ulric and the gang don’t have to do much questing to find the plagueless village, and when they get there, things aren’t really all that mysterious. The ending, in which a disillusioned Osmund wanders the world doing evil of his own, strains for coldhearted brutality, but actually just feels a bit mean.

But overall, this is a decent, well-shot, uncompromising picture. It has a strong sense of place and plague, and although my companion at the screening claims I snorted all the way through at minor anachronisms, I actually thought it was a pretty faithful vision of what fourteenth-century England might have been like. (All except for the weird Anglo-Saxon names, that is.)

Not pestilential cack, then. Lord have mercy on us all.

Black Death is released in May

January 28th, 2010

Sweary Medieval Mirren/Tarantino: well, who woulda thunk it?

The Tarantino/Helen Mirren medieval mash-up is not so much off the cards, as never was on the cards. What a surprise.

“I wish,” Mirren tells MTV. “I should be so lucky.”

Tomorrow: Daniel Day Lewis signs to play Fouke Le Fitz Waryn, as James Cameron directs Aliens vs Predator vs Outlaws: Rumble in the Greenwood.

I’m calling the Sun’s newsdesk now…

January 27th, 2010

Is Quentin Tarantino finally going to get medieval on our asses?

I admit, I’m late on this.

But.

Last week The Sun reported that Dame Helen Mirren has been tapped up by Quentin Tarantino to play - in showbiz reporter Gordon Smart’s words - “a foul-mouthed medieval monarch”. According to a ’source’ (hmm), “Helen has never worked with Tarantino and is interested.”

So many ifs, buts and probably nots here, but as a rumour it is rather pleasing. And there’s a nice parlour game, too. Which medieval queen?

Given that Hollywood would probably relax the boundaries of the term ‘medieval’ to include anything between the conquest of Britain in 43AD and the seventeenth century, my top three predictions are:

1. Boudicca
2. Eleanor of Aquitaine
3. Mary I
4. Catherine Parr
5. Hang on, that’s more than three
6.= Empress Matilda
6.= Matilda of Boulogne
8. The Lady in the Lake

I’ve discounted Joan of Arc on grounds of age. This is Helen Mirren.

Update: According to my ’source’ (actually a real sentient existing human person who knows about this sort of thing, so possibly a step up from your usual tabloid ’source’), “My gut instinct is that this is bollocks. But you never know.” Bah!

The Author

Dan Jones

Dan Jones was born in 1981 and graduated from Cambridge with a First in History in 2002.

~ Read more

The Book

Summer of Blood

Summer of Blood:
The Peasants’ Revolt of 1381 Available to buy now from Amazon.co uk