February 25th, 2010

Delaroche at the National Gallery

On Tuesday morning I went along to the press viewing for the Delaroche and Lady Jane Grey exhibition at the National Gallery, which opened yesterday.

It’s a decent exhibition, although one can see why Delaroche was out of fashion for so long. His sentimental, even mawkish renderings of great moments from Tudor and Stuart history manage to be both gruesome and twee, often at the same stroke.

The exhibition centres around his portrayal of the execution of Lady Jane Grey. Much wailing from the ladies-in-waiting; compare and contrast with the ambivalence of the axeman, who stands impassive, as though it were not an act of human cruelty he were about to commit, but a pre-determined act demanded by a higher power. Delaroche has layed on the pathos in spades by having a blindfolded Lady Jane grope helplessly for the block - you have both weepy sentimentality and a sort of grotesque historical determinism in the same canvas.

This is the model for most of the major works on show. The Princes in the Tower tremble before their murderer (represented only by a shadow under the door) while a pathetic little toy-dog yaps bravely but pointlessly at impending doom. Cromwell lifts the lid of a coffin to peer at the ashen face of Charles I’s corpse; everything about him is blood-red, to the point that it looks as though his very boots are brimming over with blood. There is a holiness to the dead King’s visage, but it hardly lights up the canvas - this is a painting literally coated in gore and cruelty.

Delaroche was, of course, a product of the French Revolution, so had seen his fair share of gore; this also contributed no doubt to the depressing inevitability of death in his major works. He is not a subtle painter, nor are his paintings especially demanding. Still, the exhibition is pretty well lit and certainly worth half an hour if you are loitering in Trafalgar Square. But as for Delaroche as the purpose of a day out? There’s not much to separate it from a quick squizz around The London Dungeon.

February 22nd, 2010

Jonathan Sumption's library

I have written in several places and at relatively great length of my admiration for Jonathan Sumption. (This is a scholarly admiration, and I have no opinion to publish here on his work as a silk.) I think this admiration has just been upgraded to green envy, on reading that he has a library of 7,000 medieval history books.

The provenance of that figure seems to be this Guardian profile from 10 years ago. In which case one would suspect that there are now another 1000 or so books on the shelf. If they are all on medieval history then it sounds like a magnificent collection indeed.

February 22nd, 2010

'Plantagenet' on BBC Radio 4: Episode 2

Richard The Lionheart

So. Episode 2 was a little better than the first. We had Henry II dying, betrayed and heartbroken, as his beloved Le Mans burned to the ground. Then we had Richard I giving Saladin’s heathen johnnies the right royal runaround in the Holy Land, then falling out with his ‘lover’ (never bought that, myself) Philip I of France and draining England of its gold in the process.

But this series is still pretty undercooked. The characters are too thin, and their motives painfully oversimplified. It’s not a subtle family drama, but it’s not a political thriller either. There are some infuriating tics: the habit of referring to the ‘King of Anjou and England’ has started to really get my goat.

And weirdest of all, this episode was narrated by a breathy, almost orgasmic Eleanor of Aquitaine, who seemed to be auditioning for a job doing the next batch of M&S food ads. It right gave me goose-bumps, and not in a good way.

Sigh.

February 19th, 2010

Bosworth Field - rediscovered

Looks from a quick buzz through the online papers that the Times has the scoop on the rediscovery of the true location of Bosworth Field, where Richard III came to a sticky end…

February 16th, 2010

Here's a recipe for medieval pancakes

Seeing as it’s the day for it. Click here.

(Note: I’ve not tried this, so can’t guarantee the quality. It’s Nigel Slater all the way in our house tonight.)

February 16th, 2010

'Plantagenet' on BBC Radio 4

Henry IIHaving missed the Classic Serial, ‘Plantagenet’, on Radio 4 this Sunday, I caught up this morning on iPlayer.

The first episode, ‘What is a Man?’ focused on the squabbles between Henry II and his sons, Henry the Young King, Richard and Geoffrey, which dominated his reign from the Great War of 1173/4 until the elder Henry’s death in 1189. Fantastic material: this is perhaps one of the stormiest stories in the whole of the later Middle Ages, as the politics of dynasty-building are played out through the folly of human ambition. There was also one hell of a war (in 1173/4), which involved virtually every major magnate from Scotland to the Pyrenees.

Walker’s storytelling was surprisingly tame. He painted the scene by numbers: the conflict between family and kingship exposing the troubled contradictions between the instincts of kings and princes, and the instincts of fathers and sons. But in doing so, the politics were oversimplified and watered down, the characters never fully fleshed out, and the battles literally non-existent. Here were a load of rich folk squabbling. Nothing more.

There were also some clumsy inaccuracies, and while I don’t have any massive objection to historical liberties being taken in the name of improving drama or dialogue, in this case they didn’t really seem to do that.

For example: the old myth about Henry’s family descending from the devil was rehashed. Fine, but none of them subsequently came across very diabolical. A bit peeved and pottymouthed, maybe. But hardly Satanic. Likewise with the Eleanor of Aquitaine stereotype: as per usual she was painted as the jilted poet queen of the south, but in her scene with the old king, as he swept her off to exile in England following her conniving in the rebellion of 1173, she was unflustered and leaden.

There were also a number of howlers. Henry as ‘the King of Anjou and England’? That’d be the King of England, duke of Normandy and Aquitaine, count of Anjou (etc) then. And right at the start, Henry II was addressed as ‘your majesty’ - a term introduced for the English monarch by Henry VIII. There were more, but it’s pedantic to list them.

I feel bad hating on a serial I was really looking forward to, and which I applaud Radio 4 for commissioning. But it was just a little bit thin. As I have mentioned here before, I am writing the history of the Plantagenets at the moment, for publication next year. So I wished this series nothing but well - these rich and wonderful times deserve their place in the zeitgeist. I’m hoping it will improve next week, when the story moves on to Richard I’s reign. I will certainly be tuning in.

February 15th, 2010

Books of the Weekend

Trials of the Diaspora

‘Trials of the Diaspora: A History of Anti-Semitism in England by Anthony Julius (OUP, £25)
The place of the Jews in medieval England was not, ultimately, a happy one. The great expulsion in 1290 is the headline moment. And there has been much criticism through the years of Chaucer’s stereotype of attitudes towards world Jewry in the Prioress’s Tale. (Although as ever with Chaucer it is unwise to try to tease out his character’s prejudices from his own.) These incidents are key parts of the narrative of Anthony Julius’ new book, reviewed in the Sunday Times by Max Hastings. Hastings found the book ‘a meticulous survey of an aspect of English life that can scarcely fail to discomfit modern readers.’ But he also regretted ‘the accusatory tone of parts of Julius’ book, a creeping sanctimoniousness in his anger.’

1492

1492: The Year Our World Began by Felipe Fernandez-Armesto (Bloomsbury, £20)
Also reviewed in the Sunday Times this weekend was Fernandez-Armesto’s thesis on the birth of modernity at the end of the fifteenth century. James McConnachie was rather impressed by Fernandez-Armesto’s ambition. But though he did not worry as much as Simon Heffer in the Telegraph (who reviewed this book a few weeks ago), McConnachie does hint at discomfort with the hesitancy of the author’s conclusions.

February 12th, 2010

Give a clown a gun and whaddya got?

Colonel Gaddafi, that’s what. Read my review of “Seeking Gaddafi”, Daniel Kawczynski’s new book about the Libyan leader, at GQ.com.

February 12th, 2010

The scrapheap of history, part II

According to this report at the Telegraph, another English university has directed cuts in Government funding towards parts of the History faculty.

Sussex University is reportedly considering a proposal to withdraw from research and specialist teaching “in English social history before 1700 and the history of continental Europe before 1900”. Not as drastic a cut as the Telegraph would spin it up to: their standfirst, referring to a letter published in today’s paper, is ‘Academics have attacked a decision by a top university to scrap research into English history before 1700′, which is technically accurate but implies a broader raft of cuts than actually seems to be proposed.

Nevertheless, it is part of the trend reported earlier in the week at King’s College, London, where the Paleography chair is to be made redundant. No doubt we will see a further trickle of these sorts of stories over the coming weeks, as academics dig in to protect their own specialist subjects and departmental funding by kicking up as big a stink as they can, knowing that the conservative press can use each case study as a political grenade to hurl at Labour.

Of course, the truth is that the Tories will have to cut at least as much from university budgets as Labour proposes to do. Will they be able to cope with the same sort of criticism, should more non-profitmaking, specialist courses and teachers go to the wall? Furthermore, how long will British universities allow themselves to be driven by the wind of political economics? Strikes me that Oxbridge and any number of the better redbricks have little to lose and everything to gain by cutting as loose as they can from government funding and looking towards an American model of private payment supported by a massively broadened scholarship system. It wouldn’t look pretty to the left, but the quality and depth of British higher education would stand a far better chance of maintaining its international prestige….

February 11th, 2010

‘Summer of Blood’ in paperback

My first book, “Summer of Blood: The Peasants’ Revolt of 1381″, is released in paperback on March 4th. You can pre-order it here. It looks rather natty in soft-cover.

The Author

Dan Jones

Dan Jones was born in 1981 and graduated from Cambridge with a First in History in 2002.

~ Read more

The Book

Summer of Blood

Summer of Blood:
The Peasants’ Revolt of 1381 Available to buy now from Amazon.co uk